<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Music Gremlins&#187; Secrets of the Music Industry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://musicgremlins.com/category/music-industry/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://musicgremlins.com</link>
	<description>F The Labels - Support The Music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:38:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Holy Cow &#8211; Imeem Has Music!</title>
		<link>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/holy-cow-imeem-has-music</link>
		<comments>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/holy-cow-imeem-has-music#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 06:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Baby Gremlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gremlins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bait and switch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ep]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[itunes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ripoff]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[saviour]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicgremlins.com/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, that&#8217;s right, for the first time ever on imeem, I saw a decent advertisement for music?!?  Can you believe it?
They&#8217;ve actually figured out that I might like to buy similar music to what I&#8217;m listening too.  Now which rocket scientists did they hire to finally figure that out?  If someone is listening to Imogen [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that&#8217;s right, for the first time ever on imeem, I saw a decent advertisement for music?!?  Can you believe it?</p>
<p>They&#8217;ve actually figured out that I might like to buy similar music to what I&#8217;m listening too.  Now which rocket scientists did they hire to finally figure that out?  If someone is listening to Imogen Heap (she did Watcha Say first), then maybe they&#8217;ll be interested in buying music?!!  Wow &#8211; amazing.  These guys finally got it.  And guess what, it&#8217;s not Imeem&#8217;s fault &#8211; it&#8217;s the music industry.  Don&#8217;t get me started again on who the idiotas are&#8230;<br />
Here was the ad that actually made me click, but I was disappointed when the ad click went&#8230;you guessed it &#8211; to the iTunes installation page.  Now how does that help me when I want to buy music?</p>
<p>Someone let the new artist Savior know that her advance is going towards iTunes acquisition&#8230;sweet.  It&#8217;s probably some type of creative ad, but guess what Saviour&#8230;iTunes doesn&#8217;t care if you sell&#8230;they only care that I install iTunes.</p>
<p>Now wouldn&#8217;t you install iTunes if the headline said this:</p>
<h2>Looking for <span id="albumname"><strong>Saviour &#8211; EP</strong> by <strong>Lights</strong></span>?</h2>
<p>HAHAHA  F*CK YOU ITUNES &#8212; YOU BAIT AND SWITCH F*CKS</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t believe me on how bright Imeem is with advertising?  Check out my previous post on <a href="http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/imeem-moves-to-deadpool-loses-battle-for-music-rights">Imeem in the Deadpool</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/holy-cow-imeem-has-music/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Michael Jackson &#8220;This Is It&#8221; Mistake? LOL</title>
		<link>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/michael-jackson-this-is-it-mistake-lol</link>
		<comments>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/michael-jackson-this-is-it-mistake-lol#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 05:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Baby Gremlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gremlins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[michael jackson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paul anka]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[song]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stolen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/michael-jackson-this-is-it-mistake-lol</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, here&#8217;s to Paul Anka who comes off once again like a greedy, whiney mofo.  And here&#8217;s to MJ, who now that he&#8217;s died is being accused of ripping of all kinds of songs (see the latest Hall and Oates for a funny one).
Here&#8217;s the music business being the music business&#8230;and to all the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, here&#8217;s to Paul Anka who comes off once again like a greedy, whiney mofo.  And here&#8217;s to MJ, who now that he&#8217;s died is being accused of ripping of all kinds of songs (see the latest Hall and Oates for a funny one).</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the music business being the music business&#8230;and to all the noobie artists out there &#8211; notice how Paul Anka waits until the whole media splash happens first so that he can get his fair split.  If Paul would have sued before they released it, they would have just changed the album lineup and the marketing of the album entirely because they too are far too greedy to share in the profits.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the Reuter&#8217;s article with Paul Anka quotes:<br />
http://www.reuters.com/article/entertainmentNews/idUSTRE59B17I20091013</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/michael-jackson-this-is-it-mistake-lol/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imeem Revived From Deadpool</title>
		<link>http://musicgremlins.com/music-industry/imeem-revived-from-deadpool</link>
		<comments>http://musicgremlins.com/music-industry/imeem-revived-from-deadpool#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 22:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Baby Gremlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[music industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[imeem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicgremlins.com/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, so I was one of the first to say that Imeem was dead&#8230;and obviously I was right
HOWEVER, they&#8217;ve just secured a fresh round of funding in a recapitalization which means&#8230;new money and new company.
Check it out on TechCrunch
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so I was one of the first to say that Imeem was dead&#8230;and obviously I was right</p>
<p>HOWEVER, they&#8217;ve just secured a fresh round of funding in a recapitalization which means&#8230;new money and new company.</p>
<p>Check it out on <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/09/30/imeem-wipes-the-slate-clean-with-6-million-funding/">TechCrunch</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musicgremlins.com/music-industry/imeem-revived-from-deadpool/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who Used SpiralFrog.com?  Ever?</title>
		<link>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/who-used-spiralfrog-com-ever</link>
		<comments>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/who-used-spiralfrog-com-ever#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2009 00:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Baby Gremlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gremlins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alicia keys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[costs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spiralfrog.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[turd]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicgremlins.com/?p=138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The subject of SpiralFrog.com is in the news again.  With one of the most awesome and in-depth looks at an internet startup music company is this week&#8217;s article at CNET.  And yes, they show numbers.
It discusses the rise and fall of SpiralFrog.com &#8211; an innovative ad-driven, streaming music website.
They Had Big Dreams &#8211; But Plopped [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The subject of SpiralFrog.com is in the news again.  With one of the most awesome and in-depth looks at an internet startup music company is this week&#8217;s article at CNET.  And yes, <em>they show numbers</em>.</p>
<p>It discusses the rise and fall of SpiralFrog.com &#8211; an innovative ad-driven, streaming music website.</p>
<h2>They Had Big Dreams &#8211; But Plopped a Turd Instead</h2>
<p>The best part of the writeup is this quote among many other figures,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8230;He noted that SpiralFrog had initially projected 2008 revenue at $55 million, then reduced estimates in January that year to $25 million, then reduced them again three months later to $3 million. &#8220;Uniques are great, but hedge funds want to see revenue,&#8221; he implored&#8230;.</p></blockquote>
<p><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-140" title="frogincome3" src="http://musicgremlins.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/08/frogincome3-300x231.png" alt="frogincome3" width="300" height="231" /></p>
<p>Check out the article for the numbers $$$</p>
<p>Awesome article, a must read.  <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10303994-93.html?part=rss&amp;subj=news&amp;tag=2547-1_3-0-20" target="_blank">Here ya go</a>.</p>
<p>After reading how bad they screwed up managing the thing, ask yourself, if they actually ever had a chance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/who-used-spiralfrog-com-ever/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>675k Awarded To Greedy Labels</title>
		<link>http://musicgremlins.com/music-industry/675k-awarded-to-greedy-labels</link>
		<comments>http://musicgremlins.com/music-industry/675k-awarded-to-greedy-labels#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Baby Gremlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[lawsuits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[riaa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[song swapper]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicgremlins.com/?p=133</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The labels have once emerged victorious by suing a grad student over 30 songs.  If you didn&#8217;t read his merciful article that he wrote before going to trial, you must read it.
He was found guilty and the punishment is 675k.  Of course this was also the guy whose defense was &#8220;he&#8217;s was just a kid [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The labels have once emerged victorious by suing a grad student over 30 songs.  If you didn&#8217;t read his merciful article that he wrote before going to trial, you must <a href="To a certain extent, I'm afraid to write this. Though they've already seized my computer and copied my hard drive, I have no guarantee they won't do it again. For the past four years, they've been threatening me, making demands for trial, deposing my parents, sisters, friends, and myself twice – the first time for nine hours, the second for seven. I face up to $4.5m in fines and the last case like mine that went to trial had a jury verdict of $1.92m.  When I contemplate this, I have to remind myself what I'm being charged with. Investment fraud? Robbing a casino? A cyber-attack against the federal government? No. I shared music. And refused to cave.  No matter how many people I explain this to, the reaction is always the same: dumbfounded surprise and visceral indignance, both of which are a result of the amazing secrecy the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) has operated under. &quot;How did they get you?&quot; I'm asked. I explain that there are 40,000 people like me, being sued for the same thing, and we were picked from a pool of millions who shared music. And that's when a look appears on the face of whoever I'm talking to, the horrified &quot;it could have been me!&quot; look.  The reason this has remained so silent despite passionate opposition is that nearly all people settle. My story of becoming an exception started four years ago.  In 2005, my parents received a letter from Sony BMG, Warner, Atlantic Records, Arista Records, and UMG Records claiming &quot;copyright infringement&quot;. They were given a number to call, which was their &quot;settlement information line&quot;, a call centre staffed by operators who, we are emphatically told, are &quot;not attorneys&quot;. The process of collecting money from these threats was so huge, they had set up a 1-800-DONT-SUE-ME-style call centre.  The operators did little more than ask how you would pay (they wanted $3,000, I believe) and repeated intimidating lawsuit statistics. I sent them a money order for $500, which they returned. I told them I couldn't pay any more. We discussed whether I might qualify for &quot;financial hardship&quot;, and then I stopped hearing from them, which I didn't question. I graduated from college and began studying for my physics doctorate.  And then in August 2007, I came home from work to find a stack of papers, maybe 50 pages thick, sitting at the door to my apartment. That's when I found out what it was like to have possibly the most talented copyright lawyers in the business, bankrolled by multibillion-dollar corporations, throwing everything they had at someone who wanted to share Come As You Are with other Nirvana fans.  I had assumed that as an equal in a court of law in the United States, my story would be told and a just outcome would result. I discovered the sheer magnitude of obstacles in your way to get your say in court. And even if you get to trial, (which only one other person, Jammie Thomas Rasset, has done) you're still far from equal with the machine controlling 85% of commercial music in the US.  But to even start fighting assumes you (a) know what you're even being sued for and (b) have a concept of what grounds to fight it on. Most of the time you know nothing except for the huge stack of paper written in legalese that says you owe several thousand dollars and it will probably cost you more than that just to hire a lawyer. If you can find one.  I had frequent contact with one of their Colorado counsel. While she was impudent to the point of vicious (&quot;Come on Joel, I think you did it&quot;), I continued to use phrases like &quot;I respect your position&quot; and &quot;we have a respectful difference of opinion&quot;. I have no record of this intimidation because the person in question made sure to keep contact restricted to phonecalls.  Every conversation consisted of her trying to get information out of me about my defense, telling me how much bigger the settlement would be if I didn't settle now. Shaken, I would call my mother, who was a state-paid lawyer in child custody cases, and ask her what to do. We blindly fired all kinds of motions at them. Eventually my mother became afraid to answer my calls, worried it would be about the case. For the court &quot;settlement&quot; I offered $5,250, which the RIAA declined, asking $10,500. I saw myself on a conveyor belt, being pulled inexorably toward the meshing of razor-sharp gears.  Then in summer 2008, I arrived home to find a letter addressed to me. The return address said &quot;Harvard Law School&quot;. Curiously, I opened and read it. &quot;My name is Charles Nesson, professor of Law at Harvard. I caught wind of your case,&quot; it said. &quot;I can be of any assistance, don't hesitate to call.&quot; I called. Nesson picked up. I said, &quot;Yes, you can be of assistance!&quot; My mom drafted a letter to him, summarising where we were. The opening line read, &quot;Dear Professor Godsend&quot;.  Since then I've learned that you don't have to accept phone contact from the RIAA lawyers, but could demand correspondence by mail. I've been deposed twice – for nine hours one day and for another seven a few weeks ago – where I was asked every irrelevant question about my life, cars that I owned, websites I've operated. The RIAA will try to denigrate this, saying I was only talking for seven hours and then five and a half, but I was stuck in their office the entire time. You think it makes any difference to me when I can't work?  My sisters, dad and mother have all been deposed. My high-school friends, friends of the family too. My computer's been seized and hard drive copied, and my parents and sister narrowly escaped the same fate for their computers. And the professor who supervises my teaching is continually frustrated with my need to have people cover for me, while my research in grad school is put on hold to deal with people whose full-time job is to keep an anvil over my head. I have to consider every unrelated thing I do in my private life in the event that I'm interrogated under oath about it. I wonder how I'll stand up in a courtroom for hours having litigators try to convince a jury of my guilt and the reprehensibility of my character.  But the support helps. I've had a great team of Nesson's students helping and the professor himself has been magnificent. Most of all, I'm touched by the warm messages of support from the people who've written in, Twittered, and Facebooked me (though I've been too paranoid to friend strangers lately). Best hopes to others dealing with the same: Brittany Kruger, Jammie Thomas, and the other 39,997 of us.  The trial starts today, 27 Monday July. Regrettably, it won't be webcast as we requested due to the RIAA's successful opposition, but we will tweet (with the hashtag #jfb) and blog as much as possible, and there is a website where you can follow us and learn more." target="_self">read it</a>.</p>
<p>He was found guilty and the punishment is <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/story?id=8226412&amp;page=1" target="_blank">675k</a>.  Of course this was also the guy whose defense was &#8220;he&#8217;s was just a kid doing what kids do&#8221; so I don&#8217;t feel too sorry for him.</p>
<p>675k to the RIAA &#8211; I wonder how much the artists are going to end up getting out that?  Any of it?</p>
<p>Also, if you can&#8217;t prove how many times the song was downloaded, how can you prove what the damages are?  I always thought that the law was founded in proof.  Proof that you actually distributed those songs to someone and in doing so that person did not buy the song when they were actually going to buy it&#8230;  How can you prove that?</p>
<p>How can you prove that much in damages when the only proof is that mediasentry downloaded the file.  Mediasentry wasn&#8217;t planning to buy that song before encountering the download were they?  Acting as the copyright holder and merely stealing your own music&#8230;does that prove that someone else is illegally sharing and causing damages to the tune of 675k?</p>
<p>Man&#8230;when are we going to see a video of one of these cases?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musicgremlins.com/music-industry/675k-awarded-to-greedy-labels/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Imeem Moves To Deadpool &#8211; Loses Battle For Music Rights</title>
		<link>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/imeem-moves-to-deadpool-loses-battle-for-music-rights</link>
		<comments>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/imeem-moves-to-deadpool-loses-battle-for-music-rights#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 20:06:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Baby Gremlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gremlins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music industry]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicgremlins.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How can I possibly say this?  I mean, they&#8217;re still operating fine right?  And there&#8217;s been no news of trouble, in fact they&#8217;re still getting funding right?
Well, to me, they are dead.
When a new revolutionary music service comes along, I know that it&#8217;s always a matter of time before the customer experience is ruined so [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How can I possibly say this?  I mean, they&#8217;re still operating fine right?  And there&#8217;s been no news of trouble, in fact they&#8217;re still getting funding right?</p>
<p>Well, to me, they are dead.</p>
<p>When a new revolutionary music service comes along, I know that it&#8217;s always a matter of time before the customer experience is ruined so bad that the company cannot sustain.  Imeem has reached that point today and I can say that their time is very limited.</p>
<h2>Why Imeem Is On A Path To Failure</h2>
<h3>First interface change</h3>
<p>With free music services, the initial innovation by the creators is typically magical.  They create a service and interface that is proven to be well liked in testing and then they get investment money to continue.  Typically, the labels let them launch as is, but, then the company realizes that the pressure is on to make money because the labels get paid from the play of free music.  The labels are cool with it, as long as the website pays the music licensing fees.  Therefore, if your company is successful, you amass a shit ton of fees in licensing.  Most of the time, rapid growth for a company is equal to success.  In streaming music, rapid growth usually means rapid bills to pay.  When the website realizes that they&#8217;re going to get squeezed on margins, they resort to their original plan of promotional package sales and PPC or CPM.  Typically, music advertising pays little for publishers because there is so much ad inventory available from places like lyrics websites.  Therefore, you must optimize your ad inventory to be more valueable through targeted advertising.</p>
<div id="attachment_130" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 251px"><img class="size-medium wp-image-130" title="Facial_Disfigurement" src="http://musicgremlins.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Facial_Disfigurement-241x300.jpg" alt="something similar on lil wayne's page for weeks" width="241" height="300" /><p class="wp-caption-text">something similar on lil wayne&#39;s page for weeks</p></div>
<h2>Welcome the Advertising Engine</h2>
<p>When Imeem made their first interface change, many customers greatly disliked it.  The new player was heavily complained about and the prescence of more advertising was brutal.  I remember multiple times going to the Lil Wayne page and seeing a ghastly advertisement from the non-profit company for fixing facial disfigurement.  Now, I don&#8217;t know about Imeem&#8217;s team here (most likely they are small since the budget is tight), BUT HOW IN THE HELL DO YOU SELL ADS when your hottest artist has a photo of facial disfigurement on it.  Now I&#8217;m all for non-profts filling the ad space when you can&#8217;t sell the inventory, but an ad like this on Lil Wayne&#8217;s page is extremely damaging to the artist.  It&#8217;s almost like having a McDonalds website featuring the juicy Big Mac next to a pile of dogshit!   But I digress&#8230;</p>
<p>The advertising had to be more heavily implemented with the second interface so that Imeem could have a chance.  Eventually, Imeem found a decent balance with their interface and their advertising.</p>
<p>I strongly dislike it when I&#8217;m listening to music and then an audio ad plays&#8230;but you know what I&#8217;m okay with it as long as your service is great.</p>
<p>Imeem emerges victorious from the ad interface changes!  Is the ad system good enough to optimize and make money?  I don&#8217;t know.</p>
<h3>Enter the Greedy Labels</h3>
<p>So after that interface change, I&#8217;m thinking&#8230;wow they still have a chance.  But today, I realized that they are heading striaight for the deadpool.</p>
<p>About six months ago, I made a couple playlists.  In one, I recreated the Pretty In Pink movie soundtrack.  I didn&#8217;t have all the songs, but 90% of them.  That&#8217;s very impressive to find that much 80&#8217;s music.  Good job Imeem (although you had it because users uploaded it &#8211; didn&#8217;t you see the other companies already fail for having users upload music?).  I also made a playlist called Chill Beats.  I make one of these playlists on every new music website to try it out.  On it, there were 22 songs spanning from the 80&#8217;s through current.</p>
<p>Now that I have returned, only six songs remain on the Pretty In Pink playlist.  And on the Chill Beats playlist, many songs remain, but they are only 30 second samples.</p>
<p>Now, I don&#8217;t know about other music fans, but I do know that you can&#8217;t be competitve if you change their experience.  As a fan, the biggest features are finding and playing music and of course creating a custom playlist for yourself.  If you create a playlist and then the playlist just disappears, then basically all the time you invested in that service is lost.</p>
<p>I cannot invest my time in a music service that steals away my time due to music licensing issues that they have not figured out.</p>
<p>My experience says that Imeem is doing everything in their power to stay alive, but the labels again view it as a temporary promotational platform with no longevity and no real interest in its success.</p>
<p>I could be wrong so prove it</p>
<p>F the labels</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/imeem-moves-to-deadpool-loses-battle-for-music-rights/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Deezer New Interface &#8211; Had A Chance At Success</title>
		<link>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/deezer-new-interface-had-a-chance-at-success</link>
		<comments>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/deezer-new-interface-had-a-chance-at-success#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Baby Gremlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[gremlins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deezer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicgremlins.com/?p=119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, I&#8217;ve been watching Deezer since the beginning.  The french version of a last.fm for those who don&#8217;t know.  Because they&#8217;ve been in France, the labels were not able to remove the music from their free streaming catalog for American listeners very quickly.  Basically, as an American I could finally listen to the music I [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I&#8217;ve been watching <a href="http://deezer.com" target="_blank">Deezer </a>since the beginning.  The french version of a last.fm for those who don&#8217;t know.  Because they&#8217;ve been in France, the labels were not able to remove the music from their free streaming catalog for American listeners very quickly.  Basically, as an American I could finally listen to the music I wanted to online in a very nice efficient online model.  The best part was that they gave you the features you wanted period.</p>
<p>After I was hooked, the music was taken down (obviously because Deezer has not secured the licensing arrangement for American IP addresses to play back the music).  So once again, as a music listener, I found a model that I liked and became extremely loyal too (just like Imeem and Last.fm before they were ruined).</p>
<p>Yesterday, I was excited again.</p>
<h2>Deezer Relaunched With a New Interface!</h2>
<p>For a whopping one day, I had all the music that I wanted again in an amazing interface.  Music heaven really and I am willing to pay for it too!  I let me friends know that Deezer was back and better than ever (and free).  By the time they got to the site, the major label music was taken down again.</p>
<p>Will Deezer make it?  Surely not.</p>
<p>Labels Will Not Sign Deals Where the Service Provider Can Profit</p>
<p>Therefore, the deals never get done.  So we can honestly say that Deezer probably has zero chance for sustainable success or profitibility.  If you can&#8217;t get the music, you can&#8217;t offer any service.  Without service, no advertising.  Without advertising, no money for licensing.  Once again the labels will do a deal with them that they can&#8217;t sustain and they will take it so that they at least have a tiny chance to make it.</p>
<p>Lame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musicgremlins.com/gremlins/deezer-new-interface-had-a-chance-at-success/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weakness: Chris Brown Video Apology</title>
		<link>http://musicgremlins.com/music-industry/weakness-chris-brown-video-apology</link>
		<comments>http://musicgremlins.com/music-industry/weakness-chris-brown-video-apology#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Baby Gremlin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[artists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chris brown]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[humor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[label]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rihanna]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://musicgremlins.com/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;A Message From Chris&#8221; should be called &#8220;A Message From Jive&#8221;
Okay, what if his label was behind the whole thing?  My take at sarcasm&#8230;sorry. 
Let&#8217;s paraphrase and analyze the revenue generation tactics together, shall we?  Notice how it&#8217;s exactly 2:00 long?  I wonder why they would do that&#8230;maybe because they want to air it as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>&#8220;A Message From Chris&#8221; should be called &#8220;A Message From Jive&#8221;</h2>
<p>Okay, what if his label was behind the whole thing?  <em>My take at sarcasm&#8230;sorry. </em></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s paraphrase and analyze the revenue generation tactics together, shall we?  Notice how it&#8217;s exactly 2:00 long?  I wonder why they would do that&#8230;maybe because they want to air it as a commercial and capitalize off the &#8220;return of chris&#8221; single coming up?</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="425" height="344" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/n4SD6oBvbKY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="425" height="344" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/n4SD6oBvbKY&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x2b405b&amp;color2=0x6b8ab6" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>1st Sentence:<br />
Since Feb&#8230;my attorney&#8230;wouldn&#8217;t let me&#8230;<br />
EXCUSE: For not accepting responsibility and telling the truth +1</p>
<p>2nd Sentence:<br />
Pay me a lot of money for interviews, here&#8217;s a quick taste to get you interested<br />
EXCUSE: for not telling the truth +1<br />
SALES PITCH +5<br />
COMBO 2+</p>
<p>3rd Sentence:<br />
I&#8217;m such a badass and I&#8217;m still better than you<br />
ANGRY EXCUSE +1</p>
<p>4th Sentence:<br />
I wish I could redo those things but I can&#8217;t<br />
EXCUSE +1</p>
<p>5th Sentence:<br />
I&#8217;m not going to sit here and make excuses<br />
&#8220;NO EXCUSE&#8221; EXCUSE +10 !!!<br />
SMIRK +1</p>
<p>6th Sentence:<br />
I take &#8220;great pride&#8221; in exercising my self control and what I did was in-excusable<br />
GIVE ME A BREAK EXCUSE: +1</p>
<p>7th Sentence<br />
I&#8217;m sad and ashamed<br />
MERCY POINTS +2</p>
<p>8th Sentence<br />
My mother and minister have taught me better<br />
DIDN&#8217;T HIS MAMA TEACH HIM BETTER PREEMPTIVE STRIKE +5</p>
<p>9th Sentence<br />
I&#8217;m telling you I should have handled the situation differently and better<br />
VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUE +5<br />
get your audience to visualize how it could be handled better<br />
STERN I&#8217;M TELLING YOU EXCUSE + 3</p>
<p><strong>YAY &#8211; THE LABEL CRAP IS OVER AND NOW CHRIS CAN TALK!</strong></p>
<p>I PROMISE THIS WILL NEVER HAPPEN AGAIN.  Amen to that Chris.  And no worries I forgive you.  Plus, there&#8217;s a lot of music that I really like but dislike the artist&#8230;so no worries at all.</p>
<p>When&#8217;s that single come out?  Are you truly going to air these as MTV commercials like the rumors say?  Now go buy some <a href="http://www.chrisbrownworld.com/" target="_blank">Chris Brown</a> stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://musicgremlins.com/music-industry/weakness-chris-brown-video-apology/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
